Rick from the Fallout Shelter brought up a great discussion topic on Facebook, and it inspired me to blog about it.
That’s a private group on Facebook, so here’s what was said in case you’re not a member:
Rick D’Agostino is looking for some feedback from the music community out there..
Dig? So now, you have the gist of it. My blog may go on its own little tangent, you never really know with these things. It’s certainly worth talking about.
First, it’s clear that I’ve never been in a band where making money is the ultimate goal. I’m amazed over & over that venue owners let me come in, set up, and play in front of people. Sometimes we get money from the door, sometimes we get money from tickets sold, sometimes we give it all to the touring band, sometimes it’s a charity gig, sometimes no one shows up to pay anyone, sometimes we get some gas money or a couple of bucks to dump back into merch or something.
This is how it’s worked nearly everywhere and every time I have played: Most of the time, the cover is $3 to $5, unless we’re opening for a national act & it’s through a booker where we’re asked to sell tickets. Some call the latter “pay to play“, and rail wholly against it. Some people have no problem selling tickets. Some bands like mine do, but we try anyway. At bar gigs, the cover charge is usually $5. Sometimes it all goes to the bands, especially if it’s a bar & if you provide your own door person. Sometimes it pays for a sound guy (if there is one) & a cut goes to the bar, then the bands get paid. Sometimes locals defer and let the out-of-town bands take the cash (if there is one). Sometimes you can play for free at open stages, sometimes you pay to get in at open stages. Sometimes no one comes out to see you, and no one gets paid. Sometimes the band gets free or discounted drinks. It’s generally a no pay or break even situation. You hope to sell merchandise and/or CD‘s if you have them, and the bar hopes to sell drinks & food. The bands should promote and the venues should promote. Some venues think the bands should do it all, some bands think the venue should do it all. Generally 3 or sometimes 4 bands are all on the same gig. Sometimes, it all works out, sometimes… it doesn’t. This is how bands who largely play their own music are forced to operate.
That’s only 1 way. There are many other “scenes” here overlapping in the ‘Burgh.
Cover bands… or human jukebox bands, can generally charge a fee for playing a certain style, genre, or “songs that people know”. This is to provide entertainment to drunken Yinzer patrons who want to yell out requests. You probably usually play 3 sets, maybe 4… and you’re the only entertainment all night. You’re probably playing pop country, classic rock, or a little mix of everything. Professional singers/songwriters operate pretty much the same way as described above, but can get away with putting in more of their own material.
High-class… I know a band that plays funk, and can get $5000 a gig at the least. They put their twist on a bunch of songs, dress up, bring lights, and put on one hell of a show. I’m pretty sure I could never command that much cash for what I do… but how is one less relevant or entertaining? They do weddings, corporate parties, and “events”.
I’m sure there’s other stuff out there that I’m not even aware of. I can’t really speak for any other parts of the scene than the one I’m in.
I’ve heard the argument that charging only $5 is devaluing our craft. Bands should demand more to be heard live. It worked for Yuengling. They raised the price on their beer in the late 90s/early 00s and they took off ahead of the other “microbrews”. Should we then put a higher value on ourselves & our art? If we raise the price do we raise our expectations? Do we raise our worth? Do we raise the value of our music & entertainment?
I also see that a cover charge can make or break a show. Times are changing. People aren’t spending money on entertainment. Music is seen like it’s all supposed to be free. Why would someone pay for a live show? To me, if you don’t have $5 on you for a show, maybe you shouldn’t be going to a bar in the 1st place. $5 might get you 2 beers if you’re a butthole & don’t tip the bartender. Then again, we hardly ever walk away with any money anyway (the Fallout Shelter is an exception here, we get paid well there, regardless of turnout), so why not let people in for free?
The tip bucket. I’d play for one. I have no doubt that we’re entertaining. Why not, right? Do all bands split the tip bucket? Or go per performance? That if the 1st band up gets all the cash & the “cleanup” band gets nothing simply because the patrons ran out of cash? Are we nothing more than indoor buskers if we play for a tip jar? Is it a better measurement of our entertainment value to work for tips? Does it devalue our art to basically beg for donations to support the rock n’ roll cause?
I certainly don’t want to see my favorite venues close because they can’t afford to operate. I like to play them, I like to see other bands in them… I want them to do well. I want them to continue to host my band & other bands. I even want them to make a buck so it’s all worth their while, and so they can do it to make a living.
I just want to play. I don’t care where, or for how much. I have fun doing it. I think this is an important discussion to have, though. What is the value of live rock n’ roll?
So…
- Would you play for less of a cover charge?
- Should we charge more for shows?
- Should bands play for tips?
- How should the tips be split?
- How does the venue make money?
- Who pays the sound guy?
Leave your opinions in the comments below!
Related Articles
World (and Lunar) Domination 
