From: Food Allergy Initiative <info@faiusa.org>
To: Me <me@my.email.address>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:30 PM
Subject: Message from FAI & Research America
| Finding a cure for life-threatening food allergies. | July 19, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
From: Food Allergy Initiative <info@faiusa.org>
To: Me <me@my.email.address>
Sent: Tuesday, July 19, 2011 12:30 PM
Subject: Message from FAI & Research America
| Finding a cure for life-threatening food allergies. | July 19, 2011 |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||
I’m pretty sure this is illegal, but I see it happen all the time. Can someone of authority weigh in on this? Opinions are of course welcome, but if you’re going to claim why it’s legal/illegal… you have to give me some kind of backup.
Let me describe the scenario with the help of an illustration thanks to Paint.NET, Google Maps, & a Google image search…
We’ll pretend I’m the blue car, behind the white truck, and in front of the little yellow bastard.
The white truck is trying to make a left at the light, only problem being (use your imagination here) a flurry of automobiles in the other 2 oncoming lanes coming forth with less than a car-length in between them, and at a speed well over the posted 25MPH limit. (Never-mind that here the middle lane switches traffic directions depending on the time of day – that’s a whole different ridiculous issue.)
Of course, the truck is forced to stop in what I would like to consider the middle of the intersection, causing frustration to rise exponentially for each halted vehicle behind the pale horse of immobilization.
As the truck plays the waiting game, and I hone my skills with the Force trying to will a break in traffic to allow him (or her) to turn and more importantly get out of my way… the impatient arrogant bastard behind me decides to honk the horn.
Honking the horn when one is stuck in traffic is the action of a self-absorbed angry little person. A honk is expected & appropriate if someone cuts you off, someone’s sitting at a green light, or backing into you. A honk is inappropriate when everyone is stuck, & no one can go anywhere.
Now, I know this indignant troll of a human being wanted me to take the path of the green arrow above… which is a common Pittsburgh driving move. I’m sure it happens elsewhere too, but it’s quite common around here. I believe said move is not only illegal, but also quite dangerous. I know passing on the shoulder is discouraged if not illegal, and doing it in the middle of an intersection isn’t the best idea.
It’s dangerous for the following reasons if you must know, traffic troll:
If you think of any other reasons why it’s a bad idea, please let me know. If you can show me a link where the laws concerning such vehicular interactions reside online (especially for PA), I’d love to pass the link along to the honking trolls out there.
If you’re a traffic troll, I’d like to express to you that all you’re doing is putting the person in front of you in danger, as well as potentially yourself, and adding to the aggravation levels of everyone around you… when they’re already sufficiently aggravated.
This has been brought to you as a public service announcement warning against the dangers of traffic trolls. I’m sure PennDOT and the State Police would get behind this if they read my blog.
You’re not a traffic troll, are you?
So, I already blogged bout my plan for Amish country, here’s what we did while we were there…
The Downtown Lancaster Visitor Center, the Heritage Center Museum, & the print shop upstairs by the .918 Club. – Yeah, all of this was in one building. The visitor center was my first stop because I had a decent dialog going before our arrival in the area with Henry at the center, and whoever is behind the goLancasterPA Twitter account. I wanted to say hello & give a personal thanks.
After a quick hello, we went on to the Heritage Center Museum for some cool Amish artifacts & hands-on toys, a quick history lesson, and a bunch of other area artifacts like some beautiful paintings, clocks, furniture, & more.
Upstairs in the print shop, we got an all-out printing demonstration from Mike Donnelly. I’ve always found that kind of stuff interesting from printing & graphic design to the art of fonts & printing. It was an unexpected surprise & it was right up my alley! I even got to make a few small prints on some antique presses!
Angry Young & Poor – Yeah, not exactly in with the theme of everything else, but I used to order from this place back when paper ‘zines & catalogs were a thing… so I had to stop since I was in the area. Dude behind the counter seemed cool, and I picked up a Sloppy Seconds CD.
The Dutch Haven – This was a store that looks like a windmill. While there, I bought some Amish root beer & tried a sample of shoo-fly pie. It felt like a toruist-trap boardwalk kind of store, but you’ll have that in tourist areas. They seemed rather nice. Also, we learned that you need to go here before Jakey’s Amish BBQ, and you’ll get a %10 off coupon.
The Outhouse – It was a like a Cracker Barrel store & a Spencer’s crashed into each other. It was full of local stuff, goofy stuff, kitch, and a bunch of silly coin-operated jokes. Fun, but once we saw it, we don’t really ever have a need to go back.
Ed’s Buggy Rides – I had an amusing online exchange with Ed … or someone at Ed’s Buggy Rides. It went sort of like this…
From: MeSent: Monday, May 23, 2011Subject: Prices?Hello,My wife & I are planning to be in the Lancaster/Strasburg area this weekend celebrating our anniversary.I was wondering what your rates are for buggy rides?Thanks,-Eric
Simple enough right? (I mean, a website ought to list that sort of thing, but…)
From: Mrs Brenda Littler <klittler@verizon.net>
To: Me
Sent: Wednesday, May 25, 2011
Subject: Re: Prices?Please call 717-687-0360.
Heh. Don’t email info@edsbuggyrides.com, just call ’em I guess. The tour did prove to be awesome though. We took the tour with another couple, and our driver/guide was quite knowledgeable about the Amish history & way of life. He was able to easily answer any questions that we had. We also stopped at a working Amish farm where I had a glass of homemade Amish root beer, and Bethany bought a Quillow from the craziest salesman ever, a 13 or 14 year old Amish girl. We weren’t getting out of there without buying something. She was showing us every quilt, wall hanging, toy, and canned good in the place. I wish I could have taken her picture. For having a seemingly communal/communist lifestyle (from each according to his means, to each according to his needs – right?), this girl was a killer capitalist! (Oh yeah, that was J & B Quilts and Crafts – they’re at 157 N. Star Rd., Ronks, PA 17572)
The Amish Village – The Amish village was a tourist trap, but it was a cool visit. The. Kid. Who. Gave. Us. The. Tour. Yelled. Syllables. Instead. Of. Speaking. Normally. He also wasn’t very good with Amish trivia or history. He said some stuff that contradicted the heritage museum, and other things that I’ve read. He also didn’t answer questions very well, or talk about the Amish men’s clothing or the significance of their hats – which our guide on Ed’s Buggy Rides had already told us about. He talked a lot about the dresses though, and knew a lot about them. Did you know the outer part of an Amish woman’s dress is pinned on with straight pins? Dude knew. He also assured is that the pins don’t jab you, and you get used to it after the first few times. Yeah. If I were the owner, I’d make sure dude wasn’t in there trying on the dresses at night.
After the upstairs bedroom tour, a woman asked about the hats… he said there was no significance where our earlier guide told us about the distinction with the rounded vs. flat indicating if the wearer has children. Then again, downstairs… a man asked about why they use animals in the field… the tour guide went on a tangent about rubber taking them too far away from home… where from what I understand they use horses to ensure that everyone tills a fair amount of land.
It was cool to see a mockup of a typical Amish house, and learn about their extensive use of propane in lieu of electricity for things like lighting, refrigeration, heat, and running things like retrofitted electric mixers.
The Hangover Part II – OK, we were out of town and decided to just relax and catch a goofy movie. The Garmin found us a local theater, we went, we laughed our behinds off. I’m guessing the Amish would not appreciate or even understand 99% of this film.
The Strasburg Railroad – We took a first class ride on this train and it was just awesome. It’s the first time that either of us was ever on a train. (Unless you count the T.) It was fascinating just to see & feel how it worked. This history behind the railroad in general is quite interesting. We sipped drinks & took photos while the train chugged along and we listened to a narrative about the countryside & the railroad itself. I would say this is a must for anyone going to the area. Next time we may hit up the railroad museum across the street, or the toy train museum. Also, next time, we’d like to ditch the Super 8 in favor of the Red Caboose Motel! This was a relaxing way to spend part of the day, & there was plenty there to entertain us for a while. Next time, we may do the picnic lunch where they drop you off for a picnic in a great little picnic area, then you ride back on a different train.
The Choo Choo Barn – The other area train attraction that we did go see was the Choo Choo Barn. This was a model train display with amazing attention to detail, it reminded me of the one here in Penn Hills that they do around Christmas. There was a fire scene were a house “caught fire”, complete with smoke, every 15 minutes… then a little firefighter popped out with a hose and put the fire out with real water. I mean, it was crazy. I wish I had better photography skills to catch all the crazy stuff in there with the odd lighting & night scenes.
One photo I did manage to get though, was a blurry one… but proof of a man taking a pee in the top floor of one of the train stations. You know the guy laughed for hours after putting that one in.
All in all, we had a wonderful weekend in PA Dutch Country, and it was an excellent way to celebrate our 3rd anniversary. We liked it so much that we hope to make it a regular trip! We’ll never run out of things to do over that way. I could spend all day taking buggy & train rides!
You can check out all the photos from out adventure here… from my Nikon D60, Bethany’s Fuji Finepix Z, and both of our phones: Grid View / Slideshow View
The next blog will be about the food. I had to break it down. This post is already incredibly long!
Well, I’m sure everyone does to a certain extent. I hate them for the obvious reasons of comfort/germs/privacy just like (I’d imagine) everyone else. I mean, everyone would rather do business on their own throne & all alone, am I right?
I hate public facilities for other reasons that are somehow more annoying than the obvious…
What did I miss? I’m sure something in public restrooms annoys you too. What is it? Am I wrong with any of the above statements? Have any horror stories? Hit me with comments…
Got some cool shots from the Pittsburgh Zoo on Sunday, thought I’d share some of my favorites. Just click on the thumb to see the full-size image:
From the FAI…
—– Forwarded Message —–
From: Food Allergy Initiative <info@faiusa.org>
To: [-mE.]
Sent: Monday, May 9, 2011 4:26 PM
Subject: Fw: FAAW – FAI’s Give It Up Campaign & Poster Contest
Food Allergy Awareness Week — May 8 thru 15, 2011
“Give It Up!” for Food Allergy Awareness Week
Food Allergy Awareness Week is here! Join FAI’s 2011 “Give It Up” advocacy campaign and show your support for the 12 million Americans with food allergies—including some 3 million children. Here’s how it works:
Show your support by giving up a favorite food for the week, a day, or just one meal. Write your elected officials, urging them to increase federal funding for research that will lead to a cure. (If you wish, you can add your story to the letters we’ve prepared for you.) The federal government only spends about $28 million a year on food allergy research—far less than on other important diseases. It’s time to solve this major public health problem! Enter our poster contest! Enter on your own, or have family and friends join in the fun. You could win a Divvies gift certificate!Since 2007, Food Allergy Awareness Week has put the spotlight on life-threatening food allergies. FAI and other concerned organizations will be conducting activities throughout the week.JOIN THE CAMPAIGN TODAY AND MAKE A DIFFERENCE!
Please help us get the word out! Share this e-mail—and be sure to take a look at these news stories:
- NBC Nightly News and MSNBC ran a compelling three-part story on the impact of food allergies on children, which cites results from an upcoming FAI-sponsored study and features interviews with 6-year-old Lily Martin and 15-year-old Morgan Smith—Colorado students with life-threatening food allergies.
- Read a statement from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases—the agency responsible for most federally funded food allergy research.
515 Madison Avenue, Suite 1912 | New York, NY 10022-5403
Phone: 855-FAI-9604 | Fax: 917-338-5130 | info@faiusa.org
Privacy Policy | Email Preferences Copyright © 2011 Food Allergy Initiative. All Rights Reserved.
That’s right, it’s FOOD ALLERGY AWARENESS WEEK!
So, out of all the people that I asked about the American Community Survey, none are so relevant as the U.S. Census Bureau itself. After all, they’re the ones who put it out. While PA State Rep. John Maher’s response is insightful and amusing, and the Spencarian’s Benjamin Kirby offers a different perspective… only the Census Bureau can comment officially. It took me slightly longer than their professed 2-day response time to get back to me, but I’m sure they have better things to do than respond to some goofy idiot with pseudonym and an email account. Also to be fair, they did kind of address my concerns on the FAQ. I was just a little more long-winded about it.
Well, without further adieu, here’s what they had to say…
– ☞⌨☜ –
from: AskCensus <askcensus@custhelp.com>
reply-to: AskCensus <askcensus@custhelp.com>
to: recrat.demopublican@gmail.com
date: Thu, Oct 28, 2010
subject: The American Community Survey? [Incident: 000000-000000]
Recently you requested personal assistance from our on-line support center. Below is a summary of your request and our response.
If this issue is not resolved to your satisfaction, you may reopen it within the next 0 days.
Thank you for allowing us to be of service to you.
To access your question from our support site, click here.
| Subject | |||||||||||||
| The American Community Survey? | |||||||||||||
| Discussion Thread | |||||||||||||
| Response (ACSO – SLH) | 10/28/2010 16:21 | ||||||||||||
| Thank you for using the US Census Bureau’s Question & Answer Center.
We appreciate your feedback regarding the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. You make many valid points and in a world free of people too busy to respond we could easily get by with one mailing. As it is, our research has shown better response results from multiple mailings and reminder cards and for this program using multiple mailings to get someone to respond to the paper questionnaire is cheaper than obtaining the information by phone or personal visit. As for the Internet response option we are in the development and testing phase for this application. The Director of the Census Bureau, Dr. Groves, supports this project not only for the ACS but also for the 2020 Census. As for reducing the time burden on the American public, the director is dedicating resources to researching adminstrative/alternative sources for the information collected on the ACS and Census forms. If you need more information or have further questions about the ACS, please call our Customer Services Center on 1 (800) 923-8282. |
|||||||||||||
| Question Reference #000000-000000 | |||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
[—000:000000:00000—]
– ☞⌨☜ –
Well, that was certainly bland, but at least they are looking to technological advances in the future. I still see this statement as crazy: “…for this program using multiple mailings to get someone to respond to the paper questionnaire is cheaper than obtaining the information by phone or personal visit.” I’d love to see that on paper. (Or better yet, in an email.)
So, you ready my letter to anyone who would listen about the American Community Survey, right? Hopefully you’ve also read the amusing reply from PA State Rep. John Maher. Now we have the thoughts of political blogger, Benjamin Kirby of The Spencerian. Through the magic of Google I happened upon his blog, saw that he liked answering political questions, and (of course) asked my question(s). I got an excellent reply…
from: Benjamin Kirby <bkirby816@yahoo.com>
to: Recrat Demopublican <recrat.demopublican@gmail.com>
date: Thu, Oct 21, 2010
subject: Re: A POLITICAL QUESTION: The American Community Survey?Hey, great letter, Recrat! Really good.
I’ll try to answer it on the blog — you’ll have to forgive me if I don’t re-post the whole thing. I’ll try to do your general concept justice, though.
Just as a quick answer, let me say that I think you’ll see huge changes in things like the ACS as well as the ten-year census over the next five to ten years. We have Facebook, Twitter, and who knows what else in the future. There is almost no reason to cut down a forest to do the ACS.
That said, I know some people who rely on the data the ACS provides, and it. Is. Critical. It’s really important stuff, and it’s so important that people fill it out, that they’ll do whatever it takes to get their attention. There’s the old marketing adage: tell them what you’re going to tell them, tell them, then tell them what you’ve told them. And the only way the government can do that efficiently right now is through snail mail and paper. Sounds weird, I know — but it’s true.
We’ll explore this more in the post in the next few days.
Thanks so much.
BJK
…and it was followed-up by a blog post:
Q & A: Answering a Question with a Question
I won’t re-post the whole thing here, but I would urge you to check out his blog, and post your comments there or here.
An excerpt…
First of all, let’s be totally fair to Recrat: he asked a great question. The only problem with it was that it was in the neighborhood of, oh, around 1,250 words. The highlights he asked about involved wasted resources in producing the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey in the area of money, time, energy, and paper.
Ha ha. Sorry for being wordy, but…
I guess it’s in all of us blog people. ☺
I sent my letter about the American Community Survey to several politicians… from the mayor of my little town, to the mayor of Pittsburgh, to Pennsylvania representatives & senators, our US representatives & senators, and even the President Himself.
Only one politician has replied so far, and it’s been about 2 weeks since my missive first went out. I figured it’s time to share, although I may keep trying. Maybe this warrants some more snail mail. Our first response comes from Pennsylvania State Representative John Maher:
– ★★★ –
from: John Maher <jmaher@pahousegop.com>
to: recrat.demopublican@gmail.com
date: Fri, Oct 22, 2010
subject: ACS
mailed-by: pahousegop.com
Congratulations on creating the most notable email nomme de plume that I have seen in some time!
I have a special appreciation for your experience, having been selected myself for the extended census exercise in 2000 AND 1990. (While that is certainly not a statistical impossibility, it did cause me to ponder the veracity of the sampling method.)
Across the decade ahead, trillions of dollars of taxpayer money will be “driven out” to states, school districts, local governments and others feeding from the trough of the taxpayer using formulae anchored to the census results. Getting the data right to begin with strikes me as a desirable goal. Could the Census folks be more efficient? I thought so before and am emphatic now. Those selected for the expanded survey should be provided an access code and directed to a web site to complete the process. Not only will forests of paper be saved, but tallying the results will require no human processing either. Those without access to computers would dial a toll-free number, tap in the access code, and the pound of paper could be delivered.
I recall attaching a note to that effect with my response to the 2000 survey but the federal government is generally uninterested in the thoughts of a state legislator.
A larger complaint for me arises from seeing how census and other data is not used thoughtfully to measure or address concerns in a scientific, unbiased manner, but rather exploited selectively as raw ingredients to contrive formulae that accomplish what those with such power wish to accomplish. When government behaves that way (which seems to be frequent), why bother collecting the data at all?
Thanks for taking time to send along such a thoughtful note.
John
John A. Maher
Member, House of Representatives
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania
– ★★★ –
I like this guy. His words aren’t calculated, his opinions aren’t guarded, and he has an obvious disdain for the large bureaucracy of the federal government. (…perhaps a little animosity there too, or is that just me?) I have to agree with his last paragraph there, it seems like that backwards science all the conspiracy theorists spout about. Just how is this data being put to use? Shouldn’t the government already know how many people are living here and how much I made last year by looking at my Taxes?
I wrote back, and haven’t had a second reply, so I’ll leave you with my last communication:
– ★★★ –
from: <recrat.demopublican@gmail.com>
to: John Maher <jmaher@pahousegop.com>
date: Mon, Oct 25, 2010
subject: Re: ACS
mailed-by: gmail.com
Thank you for your swift & thoughtful reply, Congressman Maher! I’m also gald you enjoyed my nomme de plume, ha ha. I almost feel a fear for speaking my mind… something I was raised to believe should never be a problem in the great country in which we live.
I can understand your frustration with the federal government as a state legislator. The states were originally given the majority of power.. and it seems to have shifted over the last century.
I agree completely with your assessment that we ought to be given an access code to complete the survey via internet or toll free phone number. I’ve been e-filing my taxes since I was able, and before that I remember doing them by phone along with a simple questionnaire/help sheet on news print… that had to be over a decade ago now. The waste associated with this whole thing is just mind-boggling.
While I understand the need for the federal government to collect data for programs they deem necessary, why not let local governments address the problems in their area, then ask the federal government for support to create their own solutions?
I really do appreciate your reply, and I will pass your name on to other voters as someone who cares about the people that they represent, and is up to the times with electronic communication. You may be interested to also know that yours is the first reply I received out of the dozen or so politicians, government agencies, and political pundits that I’ve contacted via webforms or email… and so far the only politician to reply!
Keep up the good work, and as a citizen, I thank you for your service & commitment to the people!
-Recrat Demopublican
– ★★★ –
I did blog about the 2010 Census and the American Community Survey before, but I felt that my blog wasn’t enough. I decided to try and reach out to the government, some politicians, some political pundits, and even one political blogger to express my concerns. I’ve been sitting on this a while waiting for some more concrete replies, but there haven’t been that many. We’ll get to the replies in later posts, but first I (with Editing help from Dave of course) present to you the letter:
– ☆ · ⌘ • ✍ • ⌘ · ☆ –
Dear [Gub’ment Employee],
Thank you for taking the time to make yourself accessible via email and/or the web, and available to address my concerns. I realize that as a steward of the people and a government employee, your time is quite valuable. The point of my missive is speaking out against what I view as the waist of resources, money, and even time, so I will try to get right to the point.
Recently, I was notified via mail that I was a picked “at random” as a participant in the American Community Survey. Then, a week or so later, I received the survey itself. If it follows the same pattern as the 2010 Census, I will get two more notifications, and someone will show up at the door to ask me the questions even though it has been filled out and sent in. Barring any other concern about the 2010 Census and focusing on the ACS, this is what I (along with 3 million other Americans) received:
For my purposes I’d like to ignore (for the most part) the arguable statistical value of questions like when the building in which I reside was built, what time I leave for work in the morning, and how many people are in my car with me when I go to work. I do enjoy the extensive reasons for asking each question available at http://www.census.gov/acs/www/ – but *.pdf is a “clunky” way to present them. I would like to say that your reason for asking about the year my residence was built, “Age of housing is used to forecast future energy consumption” is flawed. If my building was built in 1920, but recently retro-fitted with new windows, insulation, and a new energy-star furnace and/or central air, it might be better off energy-consumption-wise than a house built in the late 60’s with all original water-heaters, furnaces, etc. (On a humorous note – remember the infamous man who had a baby a few years back? Question 24 instructs you to only answer if you’re female and have given birth. He would now be a man and would have given birth. This could not be recorded as instructed. Perhaps they ought to look at amending that in the follow-up survey 10 years from now?)
But, I did not intend my letter to argue the survey content. I would like to stick to what I believe is a more pressing and relevant issue, waste. Here is what I feel was wasted in the ACS mailings.
Paper: I am not a crazy environmental activist, and I even question the actual savings when related to energy consumption on recycling, but even I am appalled at the waste of paper here. That is three letters, a reminder card, the survey itself, a glossy FAQ brochure, and a 16-page “how to answer questions in this survey” booklet, plus the survey itself, and envelopes for all of the outgoing and return mailings except for the card times three million. The letters alone are 9 million wasted pieces of 8½” x 11″ paper. Think about that number. I don’t think I’ve ever seen 9 million of anything. The survey itself couldn’t have stated its purpose on the opening page without the need of a cover letter? Did we really need the 16-page guide on filling out the survey? Including the support phone number wasn’t enough? I am not even factoring in the ink and envelope glue here. It is 2010; I would think that most people have access to the internet or a telephone, even if it is someone else’s phone or the internet at a local library (which is still free in most communities, right?). Why not send out a post-card or registered letter instructing people to take the survey via the web or by phone? It can’t be much different from what has already been set up as a “support” to the paper survey.
Energy: How much energy was consumed in creating and transporting all of these mailings? Eliminating the “you’re going to get a survey” and the “you should have gotten a survey” letters alone would have saved so much effort and, I am assuming, electricity unless you have a warehouse full of employees cranking out these surveys on Ben Franklin’s old printing presses. Even the energy that went into the creation of this thing can be factored in. How much gasoline and jet fuel was consumed in mailing these surveys? So, under energy, we are wasting human energy/effort, electricity, and fossil fuels (unless every piece of mail was delivered by electric car from plants that do not use coal for electricity production).
Time: This concern is connected with the human effort element. How many people spent time on this? How many man hours were spent compiling the questions, deliberating on how to word them, which ones to use and in what order, writing explanations on why they’re being asked, layouts for those designed, extra pamphlets proposed, decided upon, and designed, websites built, toll free help-lines set up, etc? Then we have all of the labor; the actual creation of the paper, the printing, and the distribution? How many people will be sent out to ask follow-up questions? I’ll give you that my time wasn’t wasted in filling out the survey, and I’m arguably wasting more of my own time writing this letter… but what about my time wasted reading the “you’re going to get a survey” and the upcoming “you should have received a survey” letters?
Money: Certainly all of the people involved in this have been paid for their contributions; direct government employees are also receiving what I hear are excellent benefit packages. If contracted work was used, I’m sure they were paid prevailing wages for jobs done for the government. I’m sure the paper, ink, and distribution were not free. I know the government does not pay for mail sent via the postal service, but how does that work? Does it all actually go for free, or does the post office bill it out to the different government agencies per usage? And, if you believe the old adage that time is money, then see the preceding paragraph again. Shouldn’t taxpayers be able to vote on whether we’d like money to go into projects like this survey, or the more pressing social-programs that your survey professes to bolster once all of the information is gathered? What about something as simple as food for the hungry, medical care for those who can’t afford it, or subsidizing housing for the homeless? If money is going to infrastructure, why not ask the government employees about the road conditions that they encounter on the way to work on federal, state, and local levels?
While I do take a certain pride in being selected for performing a civic duty, I cannot help but wonder about the deployment of something like this on such a massive scale. I understand that one may feel that the collection of this data is imperative, but perhaps the process through which it has been undertaken can be reviewed. Perhaps the next time this survey is taken, eliminating so much paper will be a more viable option with new technologies appearing almost daily.
Thank you again for your time, I really do appreciate that you have made yourself available to read my concerns.
Sincerely,
-Recrat Demopublican
recrat.demopublican@gmail.com
– ☆ · ⌘ • ✍ • ⌘ · ☆ –
I have no idea why I chose to use a pseudonym when the intent was to post it here anyway… but I did. I’d like to hear your thoughts before I post replies form others.